At Home Diagnostic Test for Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Posted 2 months, 3 weeks ago at 10:06 pm. 0 comments

Diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea usually involves polysomnograpy, an overnight sleep test in a sleep clinic or lab. Results of a new study indicate that a take-stingingly sleep test is at best as effective as a polysomnography and is less expensive while providing opportune results.

Obstructive beauty sleep apnea (OSA) is a ordinary medical condition that occurs in approximately nine to 24 percent of the population and can seduce to hypertension, heart problems, and stroke. The effects of untreated OSA are to blame on account of a two-fold addition in traffic accidents, a decrease in the quality of freshness of sham patients, and billions of dollars of healthcare costs annually in the US. Obtaining an accurate and opportune diagnosis is obligatory, but is becoming more difficult as awareness of the clutter grows and more patients be lacking overnight saw wood lab tests.

Polysomnography, the gold standard pro diagnosis of OSA, is an expensive proof that can only be done in a slumber center that accommodates overnight testing. In supplement to requiring an overnight stay, some patients may be reduced by geographic accessibility to an meet forty winks lab.

Researchers set in view to determine the validity of the WAKE UP evaluation, a degrade-home sleep examine and whether or not it would hatch chattels results that could be familiar as an alternative diagnostic or screening cut in the direction of OSA. The examination ¡°Validations of a Portable Home Sleep Retreat with 12-Lead Polysomnography: Comparisons and Insights into a Variable Gold Stock,¡± is authored by Peter G. Michaelson, MD, Patrick F. Allan, MD, John C. Chaney, MD, and Eric A. Mair, MD, of the Department of Otolaryngology¡ªHead and Neck Surgery and Branch of Pulmonary/Critical Be concerned and Sleep Medicine at Wilford Hall USAF Medical Center in San Antonio, Texas. Their findings are being presented at the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Forefront completely and Neck Surgery Foundation Annual Meeting & OTO EXPO, being held September 19-22, 2004, at the Jacob K. Javits Convention Center, New York Metropolis, NY.

Methodology: This comparison reflect on included 59 adult patients (49 men and 10 women) who presented at Wilford Classroom USAF Medical Center (WHMC) Sleep Laboratory for polysomnography (PSG) determination between June and August 2003. Norm man’s age was 37.8 with an common body greater part index (BMI) of 27 while average female age was 50 years veteran with a BMI of 24.4. To replication the population who commonly meet PSG, the only exclusion criteria were: those who did not wish to suffer trial enrolment, those presenting to the sleep laboratory only for a titration (determination of air insistence needed for effective hold sway over of OSA) of CPAP (continuous positive airway pressure), and all patients younger than 18 years of duration.

Patients underwent a PSG and SNAP proof simultaneously during the first half of the evensong to evaluate inasmuch as OSA. Those who were determined to oblige OSA then underwent a CPAP titration object of the residuum of the nightfall. The PSG raw evidence were read in an outside, blinded fashion, by a separate, board-certified group of snore physicians at WHMC, PSG1, and at an external center, PSG2. SNAP data were read by two unrestrained readers (SNAP1 and SNAP2) at the SNAP laboratories. Since multiple variables are recorded during both tests, a perseverance was made to use the apnea/hypoxnia index (AHI), the most commonly used variable of nap characteristics to test in the interest of OSA severity, for comparison between the two tests. Several other relationships were deliberate, including Pearson correlation coefficients (CC), receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value and Bland-Altman curves. To analyze inter-reader variability, multiple relationships were also calculated between PSG reads (PSG1 and PSG2) and ANIMATION reads (SNAP1 and SNAP2).

Results: The ordinary PSG recording time was 256 minutes; average SNAP recording time was 250 minutes. Due to the high correlation coefficient, ROC curve areas and Bland-Altman relationship, both SNAP reads (SNAP1 and SNAP2) were considered interchangeable and SNAP1 was used for push contrast against the PSG materials. Comparison of both PSG reads indicated a weaker relationship between several reads.

o Correlation coefficients: The CCs calculated between the new testing modalities is a summary of the strength of the linear association between the variables, or in this instance, AHI. With a perfect, linear relationship being 1, the CC between SNAP1 and PSG1 and PSG2 were 0.882 and 0.916, each to each.

o Receiver operating characteristic: The ROC curve is a graphical representation of the traffic below par between the erroneous negative and false positive rates because of a agreed-upon cut out, also serves as the head of the tradeoffs between sensitivity and specificity, and helps to distinguish the accuracy of DISREGARD detecting individuals with OSA at the reality AHI. The area subsumed under the curve for SNAP1 and PSG1 because AHI ¡Ý 5 was 0.916 and 0.911 for AHI ¡Ý 15. For SNAP1 and PSG2 it was 0.943 and 0.993 as far as something AHI ¡Ý 5 and AHI ¡Ý 15, individually.

o Tenderness, specificity, unquestionable and adversarial predictive value: Contrast of SNAP1 and PSG1 at AHI 5 or greater: receptiveness 75 percent, specificity 96.7 percent, PPV 95 percent, and NPV 81 percent. At AHI greater than 15: sensitivity 66.6 percent, specificity 100 percent, PPV 100 percent, and NPV 84.7 percent. Comparison of SNAP1 and PSG2 at 5 or greater: sensitivity 94 percent, specificity 86.6 percent, PPV 76 percent, and NPV 97 percent. At AHI greater than 15: sensitivity of 100 percent, specificity of 88.5 percent, PPV of 57 percent, and NPV of 100 percent.

o Gentle-Altman curves: The Bland-Altman relationship examines the mean difference of the variables and provides an evaluation of whether the two methods, on average, return a nearly the same result. For SNAP1 and both PSG1 and PSG2, the majority of the data points kill within two standard deviations of the norm difference with minimal clustering of values.

Conclusion: This den uses multiple styles of statistical enquiry to determine that there is a solid correlation between AWAKEN and PSG in measuring AHI, a standard diagnostic measure of OSA. The authors believe these findings indicate that a take-home SNAP prove may be proposed as an option to overnight PSG for the diagnosis of OSA, especially in selected populations. Furthermore, abuse of SNAP tests require expand the diagnostic and healing prowess of the practicing otolaryngologist by offering an selection OSA testing modality that is associated with not only less expense, decreased waiting time and increased convenience, but statistically proven Loosely precision. Interestingly, the researchers also confirmed that although the PSG remains the gold timber for diagnosis of OSA, it is plagued with indwelling variability and problems with reproducibility.

American Academy of Otolaryngology Climax and Neck Surgery (AAOHNS)
Undivided Prince St.
Alexandria, VA 22314
United States
Phone 703-519-1563
Fax 703-519-1587
http://www.entnet.org/ent-press/index.cfm